Honda Jazz 2011 vs Audi A1 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 121 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Audi A1 is a more dynamic driving. Honda Jazz engine produces 20 HP less power than Audi A1, whereas torque is 79 NM less than Audi A1. Due to the lower power, Honda Jazz reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Honda Jazz consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A1, which means that by driving the Honda Jazz over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Jazz consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Yeti | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Audi A1 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Audi A1 2010 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Honda Jazz is smaller, but higher. Honda Jazz is 5 cm shorter than the Audi A1, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Jazz is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
883 litres | no data | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda Jazz has 30 litres more trunk space than the Audi A1. The Audi A1 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Jazz is 0.2 metres more than that of the Audi A1. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`575 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda Jazz is better rated in child safety tests. The Audi A1 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Audi A1 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Jazz has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Audi A1, so Audi A1 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
Audi A1 has
| |