Honda Jazz 2011 vs Nissan Note 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is more dynamic to drive. Honda Jazz engine produces 19 HP more power than Nissan Note, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Nissan Note. Thanks to more power Honda Jazz reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Jazz consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Jazz could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Jazz consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Note gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Civic | Used also on Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda Jazz might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.53 m | |
| Honda Jazz is 20 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 337 litres | 325 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
883 litres | 1495 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Honda Jazz has 12 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Note. The Nissan Note may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 612 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Jazz is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan Note, which means Honda Jazz can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda Jazz scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Nissan Note has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda Jazz, so Nissan Note quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
Nissan Note has
| |