Honda Jazz 2011 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Honda Jazz engine produces 4 HP more power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Despite the higher power, Honda Jazz reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Jazz consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Honda Jazz over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Jazz consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda Jazz engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Civic | Used also on Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda Jazz might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda Jazz is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 337 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
883 litres | no data | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage capacity. Honda Jazz has 117 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Jazz is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Honda Jazz can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 1`430 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Colt has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |