Honda Jazz 2011 vs Mazda 2 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 84 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 NM | 121 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is more dynamic to drive. Honda Jazz engine produces 6 HP more power than Mazda 2, but torque is 7 NM less than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Honda Jazz reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Honda Jazz consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Jazz could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda Jazz consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 2 2010 1.3 engine: The engine is generally robust, but the use of poor-quality fuel can lead to increased burn formation. Idling speeds tend to be unstable. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.48 m | |
| Honda Jazz is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda Jazz is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 337 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
883 litres | no data | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda Jazz has 87 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The Mazda 2 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Jazz is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`580 | 1`455 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda Jazz is better rated in child safety tests. The Honda Jazz scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Jazz has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |