Honda Jazz 2017 vs BMW i3 2017
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | Electric | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
BMW i3 is a more dynamic driving. Honda Jazz engine produces 68 HP less power than BMW i3, whereas torque is 127 NM less than BMW i3. Due to the lower power, Honda Jazz reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | |||
| Range per fill-up: | no data | 245 km in combined cycle | |
| BMW i3 gets more mileage from one tank of fuel or charge. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Honda Jazz) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW i3) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | 139 mm (5.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW i3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this BMW i3 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.60 m | |
| Honda Jazz is 2 cm longer than the BMW i3, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Jazz is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1314 litres | 1100 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage capacity. Honda Jazz has 94 litres more trunk space than the BMW i3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 214 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`605 kg | 1`670 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`018 kg | 1`245 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 587 kg | 425 kg | |
| Honda Jazz load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 28 procentiem more than BMW i3. Therefore, Honda Jazz is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
BMW i3 has
| |