Honda Jazz 2015 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Honda Jazz engine produces 3 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 52 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Honda Jazz reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Jazz consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Honda Jazz over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Jazz consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 14 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Altea, Skoda Yeti | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Skoda Fabia engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Skoda Fabia 2010 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.50 m | |
| Honda Jazz and Skoda Fabia are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1314 litres | no data | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage capacity. Honda Jazz has 54 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Jazz is 0.8 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Honda Jazz can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`605 kg | 1`585 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`164 kg | 1`130 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 441 kg | 455 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda Jazz scores higher in safety tests. The Honda Jazz scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Jazz has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |