Honda Jazz 2015 vs Mazda 2 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Honda Jazz engine produces 12 HP more power than Mazda 2, but torque is 25 NM less than Mazda 2. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Honda Jazz consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that by driving the Honda Jazz over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda Jazz consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | 143 mm (5.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 2 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 2 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Honda Jazz is smaller, but higher. Honda Jazz is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda Jazz is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1314 litres | 950 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda Jazz has 74 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The Mazda 2 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 364 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Jazz is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Honda Jazz can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`605 | 1`535 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Mazda 2 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Honda Jazz has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 2, so Honda Jazz quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |