Honda Jazz 2015 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Honda Jazz engine produces 50 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 127 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Honda Jazz reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 62 litres | |
| 710 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Honda Jazz is smaller, but higher. Honda Jazz is 37 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Jazz is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 324 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1314 litres | 1500 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Honda Jazz has 30 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The Volvo V40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 186 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`605 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Honda Jazz has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volvo V40, so Honda Jazz quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |