Honda Jazz 2015 vs Nissan Micra 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 73 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 16.4 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is more dynamic to drive. Honda Jazz engine produces 29 HP more power than Nissan Micra, whereas torque is 28 NM more than Nissan Micra. Thanks to more power Honda Jazz reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Jazz consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that by driving the Honda Jazz over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Jazz consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Micra engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Dacia Sandero | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Honda Jazz is smaller, but higher. Honda Jazz and Nissan Micra are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1314 litres | 1004 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage capacity. Honda Jazz has 54 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Micra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 310 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Jazz is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Honda Jazz can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`605 | 1`490 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda Jazz scores higher in safety tests. The Honda Jazz scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |