Honda Jazz 2015 vs Mazda 2 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 NM | 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is more dynamic to drive. Honda Jazz engine produces 27 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Honda Jazz reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Jazz consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that by driving the Honda Jazz over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Jazz consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 2 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 2 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 2 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda 2 2010 1.3 engine: The engine is generally robust, but the use of poor-quality fuel can lead to increased burn formation. Idling speeds tend to be unstable. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.48 m | |
| Honda Jazz is 8 cm longer than the Mazda 2, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda Jazz is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1314 litres | 787 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage capacity. Honda Jazz has 104 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 527 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Jazz is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Honda Jazz can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`605 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda Jazz is better rated in child safety tests. The Honda Jazz scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Jazz has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |