Honda Jazz 2015 vs Citroen C3 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is more dynamic to drive. Honda Jazz engine produces 20 HP more power than Citroen C3, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Citroen C3. Thanks to more power Honda Jazz reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Honda Jazz consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Jazz could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda Jazz consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C1, Peugeot 2008, Opel Crossland | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda Jazz is 5 cm longer than the Citroen C3, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Jazz is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1314 litres | no data | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage capacity. Honda Jazz has 54 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Jazz is 0.6 metres more than that of the Citroen C3, which means Honda Jazz can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`605 | 1`511 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C3 has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
Citroen C3 has
| |