Honda Jazz 2002 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.3 (petrol) | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 78 - 83 HP | 68 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 119 NM | 100 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 - 13.1 seconds | 8 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 5.8 | 4.4 - 6.8 | |
|
Honda Jazz petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.83 m | 3.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.55 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda Jazz is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Jazz is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1323 litres | 760 litres | |
| Honda Jazz has 120 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 563 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Jazz is 1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Honda Jazz can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`465 | ~ 1`497 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |