Honda Jazz 2002 vs Mazda 2 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.3 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 78 - 83 HP | 68 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 119 NM | 110 - 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 - 13.1 seconds | 11.4 - 16 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 5.8 | 4.5 - 7.1 | |
|
Honda Jazz petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.83 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.54 m | |
| Honda Jazz is 9 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda Jazz is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 267 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1323 litres | 1044 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda Jazz has 113 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The Mazda 2 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 279 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`465 | ~ 1`512 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |