Honda Jazz 2004 vs Volkswagen Polo 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.2 - 1.3 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 78 - 83 HP | 45 - 100 HP | |
Torque: | 110 - 119 NM | 76 - 135 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 - 14.1 seconds | 10.5 - 21.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 5.8 | 4.7 - 8.6 | |
Honda Jazz petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.84 m | 3.72 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.42 m | |
Honda Jazz is larger. Honda Jazz is 12 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Honda Jazz is 10 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 245 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1323 litres | 975 litres | |
Honda Jazz has more luggage capacity. Honda Jazz has 135 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 348 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda Jazz is 1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Honda Jazz can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`465 | ~ 1`401 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | high | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |