Honda Jazz 2004 vs Volkswagen Polo 1994

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Honda Jazz
2004 - 2007
Volkswagen Polo
1994 - 1999
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.3 (petrol)1.0 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 78 - 83 HP45 - 100 HP
Torque: 110 - 119 NM76 - 135 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.9 - 14.1 seconds10.5 - 21.4 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.5 - 5.84.7 - 8.6
Honda Jazz petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.84 m3.72 m
Width: 1.68 m1.66 m
Height: 1.52 m1.42 m
Honda Jazz is larger.
Honda Jazz is 12 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Honda Jazz is 10 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres245 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1323 litres975 litres
Honda Jazz has more luggage capacity.
Honda Jazz has 135 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 348 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Honda Jazz is 1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Honda Jazz can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`465~ 1`401
Safety:
Quality:
high

above average
Average price (€): 1800800
Pros and Cons: Honda Jazz has
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Volkswagen Polo has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv