Honda Jazz 2008 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.3 (petrol) | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 99 HP | 75 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 - 127 NM | 100 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 - 14 seconds | 8 - 12.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.8 - 6.8 | |
|
Honda Jazz petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda Jazz is 9 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 428 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1396 litres | 400 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage capacity. Honda Jazz has 208 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 996 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Jazz is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Honda Jazz can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`510 | ~ 1`463 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |