Honda Jazz 2011 vs Suzuki Swift 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.3 (petrol) | 1.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 102 HP | 75 - 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 - 127 NM | 118 - 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 - 12.6 seconds | 12.3 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 5.5 | 4.2 - 5.6 | |
|
Honda Jazz petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Swift. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda Jazz is 5 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda Jazz is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 337 litres | 204 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
883 litres | no data | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage capacity. Honda Jazz has 133 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Jazz is 1.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Honda Jazz can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`581 | ~ 1`507 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |