Honda Jazz 2011 vs Nissan Micra 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.2 - 1.3 | 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 102 HP | 80 - 98 HP | |
Torque: | 114 - 127 NM | 110 - 142 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 - 12.6 seconds | 11.3 - 14.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 5.5 | 4.1 - 5.4 | |
Honda Jazz petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Micra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.90 m | 3.78 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
Height: | 1.53 m | 1.52 m | |
Honda Jazz is larger. Honda Jazz is 12 cm longer than the Nissan Micra, 3 cm wider, while the height of Honda Jazz is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 337 litres | 265 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
883 litres | 1132 litres | |
Honda Jazz has 72 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Micra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 249 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda Jazz is 1.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Honda Jazz can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`581 | ~ 1`454 | |
Safety: | |||
Honda Jazz scores higher in safety tests, but Nissan Micra is better rated in child safety tests. The Honda Jazz scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 6000 | 4600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |