Honda Jazz 2015 vs Volvo V40 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 120 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 - 12 seconds | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 5.0 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
|
Honda Jazz petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Honda Jazz is smaller, but higher. Honda Jazz is 37 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Jazz is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1314 litres | 1500 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Honda Jazz has 19 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The Volvo V40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 186 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`605 | ~ 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |