Honda Insight 2012 vs Ford Puma 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 | 1.4 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 - 112 HP | 90 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 121 - 142 NM | 122 - 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 9.2 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 7.2 - 7.4 | |
|
Honda Insight petrol engines consumes on average 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Puma. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 3.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Honda Insight is larger. Honda Insight is 42 cm longer than the Ford Puma, 3 cm wider, while the height of Honda Insight is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 408 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1017 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Insight is 1.1 metres more than that of the Ford Puma, which means Honda Insight can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`650 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Insight has
|
Ford Puma has
| |