Honda HR-V 2015 vs Honda CR-V 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Honda HR-V engine produces 10 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Honda HR-V is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Honda HR-V consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Honda HR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda HR-V consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2012: Vehicle has automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under normal conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly interacts with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and electric power steering to provide full vehicle control, good traction and maneuverability in all road conditions. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Honda HR-V is smaller. Honda HR-V is 28 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Honda HR-V is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 431 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1456 litres | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Honda HR-V has 158 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 213 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda HR-V is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Honda HR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda HR-V is better rated in child safety tests. The Honda HR-V scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda HR-V has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |