Honda HR-V 2015 vs Mazda CX-3 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 208 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Honda HR-V engine produces 10 HP less power than Mazda CX-3, whereas torque is 36 NM less than Mazda CX-3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda HR-V consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda HR-V could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 44 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Honda HR-V can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Honda HR-V is larger. Honda HR-V is 2 cm longer than the Mazda CX-3, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda HR-V is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 431 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1456 litres | 1260 litres | |
|
Honda HR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda HR-V has 81 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda HR-V (by 196 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda HR-V is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-3, which means Honda HR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Honda HR-V scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 14 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda HR-V has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |