Honda HR-V 2015 vs Mazda CX-3 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 208 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Honda HR-V engine produces 10 HP less power than Mazda CX-3, whereas torque is 36 NM less than Mazda CX-3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda HR-V consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda HR-V could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 44 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Honda HR-V can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Mazda CX-3 2014 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-3 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Honda HR-V is larger. Honda HR-V is 2 cm longer than the Mazda CX-3, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda HR-V is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 431 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1456 litres | 1260 litres | |
|
Honda HR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda HR-V has 81 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda HR-V (by 196 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda HR-V is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-3, which means Honda HR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Honda HR-V scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda HR-V has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |