Honda HR-V 1999 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is a more dynamic driving. Honda HR-V engine produces 45 HP less power than Chevrolet Captiva, whereas torque is 185 NM less than Chevrolet Captiva. Due to the lower power, Honda HR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 8.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Captiva gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.11 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Honda HR-V is smaller. Honda HR-V is 53 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Captiva, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Honda HR-V is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 465 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 285 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 930 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space (by 180 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda HR-V is 0.7 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva, which means Honda HR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`580 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda HR-V has
|
Chevrolet Captiva has
| |