Honda HR-V 1999 vs Subaru Forester 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is a more dynamic driving. Honda HR-V engine produces 20 HP less power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 49 NM less than Subaru Forester. Due to the lower power, Honda HR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
The Honda HR-V is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Honda HR-V consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that by driving the Honda HR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda HR-V consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.11 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Honda HR-V is smaller. Honda HR-V is 34 cm shorter than the Subaru Forester, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Honda HR-V is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda HR-V has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |