Honda HR-V 1999 vs Nissan X-Trail 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Honda HR-V engine produces 35 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 57 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Honda HR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Honda HR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda HR-V consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Honda HR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda HR-V consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Nissan X-Trail 2001: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.11 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Honda HR-V is smaller. Honda HR-V is 40 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Honda HR-V is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Honda HR-V has 125 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda HR-V is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda HR-V has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |