Honda HR-V 1999 vs Honda Jazz 2004
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 83 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Honda HR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda HR-V engine produces 22 HP more power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Honda Jazz. Thanks to more power Honda HR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda HR-V consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda HR-V could require 435 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda HR-V consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Jazz gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.11 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Honda HR-V is larger. Honda HR-V is 27 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, 2 cm wider, while the height of Honda HR-V is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1323 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Honda HR-V uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda HR-V is 1 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Honda HR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`640 kg | 1`470 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`257 kg | 980 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 383 kg | 490 kg | |
| Honda HR-V load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 28 procentiem less than Honda Jazz. Therefore, Honda Jazz is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda HR-V has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |