Honda HR-V 2001 vs Land Rover Freelander 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Honda HR-V) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Freelander) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
| Honda HR-V engine produces 7 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 125 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Despite less power, Honda HR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Honda HR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda HR-V consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Honda HR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda HR-V consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.01 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Honda HR-V is smaller. Honda HR-V is 41 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Honda HR-V is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda HR-V is 1.1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Honda HR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda HR-V has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |