Honda HR-V 2001 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 3.2 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Honda HR-V) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Honda HR-V engine produces 65 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 238 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Honda HR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Honda HR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda HR-V consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Honda HR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda HR-V consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.11 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Honda HR-V is smaller. Honda HR-V is 28 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 18 cm narrower, while the height of Honda HR-V is 27 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1790 litres | |
|
Honda HR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mitsubishi Pajero may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 1`640 kg | 2`800 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`257 kg | 2`310 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 383 kg | 490 kg | |
| Honda HR-V load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 28 procentiem less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Therefore, Mitsubishi Pajero is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda HR-V has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |