Honda HR-V 2001 vs Nissan X-Trail 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Honda HR-V) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Nissan X-Trail) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
| Honda HR-V engine produces 9 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 135 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Despite less power, Honda HR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda HR-V consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda HR-V could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda HR-V consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.11 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Honda HR-V is smaller. Honda HR-V is 40 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Honda HR-V is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Honda HR-V has 125 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda HR-V is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda HR-V has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |