Honda HR-V 2015 vs Honda CR-V 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Honda HR-V engine produces 20 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Honda CR-V. Despite less power, Honda HR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 7.9 | |
|
The Honda HR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda HR-V consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Honda HR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Honda HR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Honda HR-V is smaller. Honda HR-V is 28 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Honda HR-V is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 431 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1456 litres | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Honda HR-V has 158 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 213 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda HR-V is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Honda HR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`790 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda HR-V is better rated in child safety tests. The Honda HR-V scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda HR-V has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |