Honda HR-V 2015 vs Suzuki SX4 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Suzuki SX4 is a more dynamic driving. Honda HR-V engine produces 10 HP less power than Suzuki SX4, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Suzuki SX4. Due to the lower power, Honda HR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.4 | |
| Honda HR-V consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda HR-V could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Suzuki SX4 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Suzuki SX4 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from five 4x4 versions of Suzuki SX4 2016 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Vitara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki SX4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Suzuki SX4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Suzuki SX4 2016 1.4 engine: The K14C Boosterjet engine is equipped with a turbocharging system that enhances air intake, providing excellent torque as early as 1,500 RPM.
However, the direct injection system contributes to carbon ... More about Suzuki SX4 2016 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.59 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda HR-V and Suzuki SX4 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 431 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1456 litres | 1269 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda HR-V is 1 metres more than that of the Suzuki SX4, which means Honda HR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`790 kg | 1`730 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`312 kg | 1`150 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 478 kg | 580 kg | |
| Honda HR-V load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem less than Suzuki SX4. Therefore, Suzuki SX4 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 800 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda HR-V has
|
Suzuki SX4 has
| |