Honda HR-V 2015 vs Opel Mokka 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Honda HR-V) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Opel Mokka) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Opel Mokka is a more dynamic driving. Honda HR-V engine produces 20 HP less power than Opel Mokka, but torque is 100 NM more than Opel Mokka. Due to the lower power, Honda HR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 6.3 | |
|
The Honda HR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda HR-V consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that by driving the Honda HR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Honda HR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Honda HR-V can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Honda HR-V version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Mokka engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Zafira, Opel Meriva, Opel Insignia | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Mokka might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Opel Mokka engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Opel Mokka 2016 1.4 engine: The Opel 1.4 Turbo engines with codes A14NET and A14NEL are 1.4-liter turbocharged units producing around 140 hp. They use a timing chain and a cast-iron cylinder block, which contributes to decent durability when the engine is maintained properly. With regular servicing—particularly frequent oil ... More about Opel Mokka 2016 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.66 m | |
| Honda HR-V is 2 cm longer than the Opel Mokka, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda HR-V is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 393 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1456 litres | 1372 litres | |
|
Honda HR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda HR-V has 37 litres more trunk space than the Opel Mokka. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda HR-V (by 84 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda HR-V is 0.1 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`828 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda HR-V scores higher in safety tests, but Opel Mokka is better rated in child safety tests. The Honda HR-V scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 14 600 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda HR-V has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |