Honda HR-V 2015 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Honda HR-V engine produces 30 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. Despite less power, Honda HR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 5.8 | |
|
The Honda HR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda HR-V consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Honda HR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| Honda HR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi ASX engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi L 200 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi ASX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.63 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda HR-V is 6 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Honda HR-V is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 393 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1456 litres | 1219 litres | |
| Honda HR-V has 26 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda HR-V (by 237 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda HR-V is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Honda HR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda HR-V has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |