Honda HR-V 2015 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Honda HR-V engine produces 30 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Honda HR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Honda HR-V is smaller. Honda HR-V is 6 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 12 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 393 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1456 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Honda HR-V has 157 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda HR-V is 0.1 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda HR-V has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |