Honda HR-V 1998 vs Honda Civic 1996
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Honda Civic is a more dynamic driving. Honda HR-V engine produces 55 HP less power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Honda Civic. Due to the lower power, Honda HR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda HR-V consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda HR-V could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda HR-V consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 530 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda HR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.01 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.39 m | |
| Honda HR-V is 45 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda HR-V is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | 335 litres | |
|
Honda Civic has more luggage space. Honda HR-V has 50 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda HR-V is 0.4 metres more than that of the Honda Civic, which means Honda HR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`580 kg | 1`690 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`180 kg | 1`190 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 400 kg | 500 kg | |
| Honda HR-V load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem less than Honda Civic. Therefore, Honda Civic is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda HR-V has
|
Honda Civic has
| |