Honda HR-V 1999 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 (petrol) | 2.0 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 127 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 220 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 - 13.2 seconds | 8.8 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 - 8.7 | 7.2 - 11.5 | |
|
Honda HR-V petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Captiva. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.11 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Honda HR-V is smaller. Honda HR-V is 53 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Captiva, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Honda HR-V is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 930 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space. Honda HR-V has 180 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Captiva. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda HR-V is 1.3 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva, which means Honda HR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`610 | ~ 2`454 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda HR-V has
|
Chevrolet Captiva has
| |