Honda HR-V 2001 vs Subaru Forester 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Honda HR-V is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Subaru Forester has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Honda HR-V is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Subaru Forester can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Honda HR-V also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 124 HP | 125 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 - 144 NM | 184 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 - 11.2 seconds | 6.3 - 13.4 seconds | |
| In general, Subaru Forester are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Honda HR-V. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 - 8.6 | 8.5 - 11.0 | |
|
Honda HR-V petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Subaru Forester. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.01 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Honda HR-V is smaller. Honda HR-V is 44 cm shorter than the Subaru Forester, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1525 litres | |
|
Subaru Forester has more luggage space. Honda HR-V has 121 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda HR-V is 0.1 metres less than that of the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`640 kg | ~ 1`943 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`287 kg | ~ 1`424 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 353 kg | ~ 519 kg | |
| Honda HR-V load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 47 procentiem less than Subaru Forester. Therefore, Subaru Forester is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda HR-V has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |