Honda FR-V 2005 vs Renault Scenic 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Honda FR-V engine produces 10 HP less power than Renault Scenic, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Honda FR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Honda FR-V consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda FR-V could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda FR-V consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda CR-V, Honda Civic, Honda Accord | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Renault Scenic engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.62 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda FR-V is 2 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 1 cm wider, while the height of Honda FR-V is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1049 litres | 1840 litres | |
| Honda FR-V has 9 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 791 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda FR-V is 0.9 metres more than that of the Renault Scenic, which means Honda FR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`130 | 2`025 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Renault Scenic has
| |