Honda FR-V 2007 vs Honda Stream 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Honda FR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda FR-V engine produces 15 HP more power than Honda Stream, whereas torque is 21 NM more than Honda Stream. Thanks to more power Honda FR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Stream is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Honda FR-V consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Stream, which means that by driving the Honda FR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda FR-V consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Stream. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Civic | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda FR-V | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda Stream might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.59 m | |
| Honda FR-V is 29 cm shorter than the Honda Stream, 11 cm wider, while the height of Honda FR-V is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 6 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 158 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 158 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 439 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1049 litres | 1520 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Stream (by 471 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda FR-V is 0.5 metres less than that of the Honda Stream, which means Honda FR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda FR-V has
|
Honda Stream has
| |