Honda FR-V 2007 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Honda FR-V engine produces 10 HP less power than Citroen C4 Picasso, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Honda FR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda FR-V consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda FR-V could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda FR-V consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 530'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C4 Picasso engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda CR-V, Honda Civic, Honda Accord | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4, Peugeot 5008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Citroen C4 Picasso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Honda FR-V is smaller. Honda FR-V is 19 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Honda FR-V is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1049 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage space. Honda FR-V has 61 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda FR-V is 0.8 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Honda FR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`130 | 2`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda FR-V has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |