Honda FR-V 2007 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Honda FR-V engine produces 10 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Honda FR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Honda FR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda FR-V consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Honda FR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda FR-V consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda FR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2007: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Civic | Used also on Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Honda FR-V is smaller. Honda FR-V is 24 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Honda FR-V is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1049 litres | 955 litres | |
| Honda FR-V has 117 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda FR-V (by 94 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda FR-V is 1.3 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Honda FR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`975 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda FR-V has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |