Honda FR-V 2007 vs Renault Scenic 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Honda FR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda FR-V engine produces 30 HP more power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Renault Scenic. Thanks to more power Honda FR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Honda FR-V consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Honda FR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda FR-V consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Civic | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Clio, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Honda FR-V 2007 1.8 engine: The engine is demanding on the quality of petrol and oil used. Use of poor quality fuel can lead to repairs of the lambda sensor and catalytic converter. The chain tensioner and the engine cushions have a ... More about Honda FR-V 2007 1.8 engine Renault Scenic 2006 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Scenic 2006 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.62 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda FR-V is 3 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 1 cm wider, while the height of Honda FR-V is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1049 litres | 1840 litres | |
| Honda FR-V has 33 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 791 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda FR-V is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`975 | 1`925 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda FR-V has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |