Honda FR-V 2007 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Honda FR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda FR-V engine produces 20 HP more power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Citroen C4 Picasso. Thanks to more power Honda FR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda FR-V consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda FR-V could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda FR-V consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Civic | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Citroen C5, Peugeot 3008, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Citroen C4 Picasso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Honda FR-V is smaller. Honda FR-V is 19 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Honda FR-V is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1049 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage space. Honda FR-V has 61 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda FR-V is 0.8 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Honda FR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`975 | 2`015 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda FR-V has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |