Honda FR-V 2007 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Honda FR-V is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Citroen C4 Picasso is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.2 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 112 - 150 HP | |
Torque: | 175 - 340 NM | 160 - 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 - 12.5 seconds | 9.9 - 12.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 - 8.1 | 5.2 - 6.9 | |
Honda FR-V petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C4 Picasso. On average, Honda FR-V equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.29 m | 4.47 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.68 m | |
Honda FR-V is smaller. Honda FR-V is 19 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Honda FR-V is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 500 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1049 litres | no data | |
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage space. Honda FR-V has 61 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda FR-V is 0.8 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Honda FR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`042 | ~ 2`065 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda FR-V has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |