Honda Civic 1996 vs Honda Prelude 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 133 HP | |
Torque: | 140 NM | 179 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
Honda Prelude is a more dynamic driving. Honda Civic engine produces 28 HP less power than Honda Prelude, whereas torque is 39 NM less than Honda Prelude. Due to the lower power, Honda Civic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 9.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Civic consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Prelude, which means that by driving the Honda Civic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Civic consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Prelude. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
750 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
600 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.46 m | 4.54 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.32 m | |
Honda Civic is smaller, but higher. Honda Civic is 8 cm shorter than the Honda Prelude, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Civic is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda Civic is 1 metres less than that of the Honda Prelude, which means Honda Civic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Honda Prelude has
| |