Honda Civic 1996 vs Honda CRX 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Honda CRX is a more dynamic driving. Honda Civic engine produces 20 HP less power than Honda CRX, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Honda CRX. Due to the lower power, Honda Civic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Civic consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CRX, which means that by driving the Honda Civic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Civic consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CRX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 600 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Civic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.26 m | |
| Honda Civic is 46 cm longer than the Honda CRX, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda Civic is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Civic is 0.8 metres more than that of the Honda CRX, which means Honda Civic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Honda CRX has
| |