Honda Civic 1996 vs Chrysler Sebring 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Honda Civic engine produces 98 HP less power than Chrysler Sebring, whereas torque is 138 NM less than Chrysler Sebring. Due to the lower power, Honda Civic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Civic consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that by driving the Honda Civic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Civic consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Honda Civic is smaller, but slightly higher. Honda Civic is 37 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Civic is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 460 litres | |
|
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage space. Honda Civic has 55 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |