Honda Civic 2003 vs Honda Civic 2001
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.7 Petrol | 1.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 129 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Honda Civic 2003 engine produces 4 HP less power than Honda Civic 2001, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 7 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
| Honda Civic 2003 is 2 cm longer than the Honda Civic 2001, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Civic 2003 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 450 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Honda Civic 2003 has 9 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic 2001. This could mean that the Honda Civic 2003 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`590 | 1`585 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda Civic has
| |