Honda Civic 2003 vs Smart ForTwo 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Petrol | 0.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Honda Civic is more dynamic to drive. Honda Civic engine produces 45 HP more power than Smart ForTwo, whereas torque is 42 NM more than Smart ForTwo. Thanks to more power Honda Civic reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Smart ForTwo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Civic consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Smart ForTwo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Civic could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Civic consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Smart ForTwo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 33 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Civic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Honda Civic) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Smart ForTwo) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 2.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.52 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Honda Civic is larger, but lower. Honda Civic is 198 cm longer than the Smart ForTwo, 17 cm wider, while the height of Honda Civic is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 8.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Civic is 2.3 metres more than that of the Smart ForTwo, which means Honda Civic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`570 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Honda Civic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Smart ForTwo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Honda Civic, so Honda Civic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Smart ForTwo has
| |