Honda Civic 2003 vs Chrysler Sebring 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.7 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 HP | 203 HP | |
Torque: | 152 NM | 278 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 10 seconds | |
Honda Civic engine produces 83 HP less power than Chrysler Sebring, whereas torque is 126 NM less than Chrysler Sebring. Despite less power, Honda Civic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 10.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Civic consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that by driving the Honda Civic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Civic consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
870 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
720 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Honda Civic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.83 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.37 m | |
Honda Civic is smaller, but slightly higher. Honda Civic is 35 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Civic is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 460 litres | |
Honda Civic has 19 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`570 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1600 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |