Honda Civic 2002 vs Honda Jazz 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Honda Civic) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Honda Jazz) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 83 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Honda Civic is more dynamic to drive. Honda Civic engine produces 18 HP more power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 101 NM more than Honda Jazz. Thanks to more power Honda Civic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Civic consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that by driving the Honda Civic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Civic consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Civic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Honda Civic is larger, but lower. Honda Civic is 31 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, 2 cm wider, while the height of Honda Civic is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 315 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
610 litres | 1323 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Honda Civic uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 713 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Civic is 1.6 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Honda Civic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`640 kg | 1`470 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`265 kg | 980 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 375 kg | 490 kg | |
| Honda Civic load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 31 procentiem less than Honda Jazz. Therefore, Honda Jazz is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Civic has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |